BACK TO SECTIONS(2005) 6 SCC 1(2012) 2 SCC 648
Bailable (106.1) / Non-Bailable (106.2)Cognizable: YesMagistrate First Class
Reform Highlights
1
Base punishment for negligent death increased from 2 to 5 years (BNS 106.1).
2
New severe, non-bailable penalty of up to 10 years for 'Hit and Run' (BNS 106.2) — no IPC equivalent.
3
Legal duty to report to police or a magistrate 'soon after' a fatal road accident created.
4
Medical negligence causing death also covered under BNS 106.1 with enhanced punishment.
THE STATUTE
The Clause
(1) Whoever causes death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine. (2) Whoever causes death of any person by rash and negligent driving of vehicle not amounting to culpable homicide, and escapes without reporting it to a police officer or a Magistrate soon after the incident, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Legal Commentary
Section 106 is among the most consequential reforms in the BNS for ordinary citizens, addressing the daily tragedy of road deaths. The section replaces IPC 304A (negligent causing of death) and introduces two significant changes. Sub-section (1) deals with general negligent death — including medical negligence, workplace accidents, and general rashness — and triples the maximum sentence from IPC 304A's 2 years to 5 years. This reflects India's growing impatience with deaths caused by avoidable recklessness, including medical negligence. Sub-section (2) is entirely new — the 'Hit and Run' provision. It creates a separate, more severe offence for drivers who cause a death through rash and negligent driving and then flee the scene without reporting to police or a magistrate. The maximum is 10 years (non-bailable) — a dramatic escalation from the general provision. The rationale is powerful: a driver who stays at the scene, calls an ambulance, and reports to police has given the victim the best chance of survival and has cooperated with the justice system. A driver who flees leaves the victim without immediate help, destroys evidence, and avoids accountability. The mandatory reporting requirement — 'soon after the incident' — transforms the driver's duty from a moral obligation into a legal one with criminal consequences for breach. When this provision was first announced, truck drivers across India went on strike, fearing its application. The Supreme Court and the government subsequently clarified its scope, but the provision remains on the books as enacted.
Landmark Precedents
Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab (2005)
RELEVANCE
Supreme Court laid out the standard for medical negligence under IPC 304A (now BNS 106.1) — 'gross negligence' or 'recklessness' must be established; mere professional error is not criminal negligence.
Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra (2012)
RELEVANCE
Hit-and-run accident by a drunk driver — Supreme Court examined the boundary between negligent death (IPC 304A) and culpable homicide (IPC 304/300) in drunk-driving fatality cases.
Case Simulations
"A driver who runs a red light at high speed, kills a motorcyclist, stops, calls an ambulance, and reports to police — BNS 106(1), bailable, maximum 5 years."
"A driver who knocks down a pedestrian at night, sees them fall, and drives away without stopping or reporting — BNS 106(2), non-bailable, up to 10 years."
"A surgeon who, due to gross negligence in administering anaesthesia, causes a patient's death — BNS 106(1), subject to the Jacob Mathew standard of gross negligence."
"A truck driver who is distracted by his phone, swerves into an oncoming auto-rickshaw, kills the driver, and stops to help — BNS 106(1)."
Expert Insights
The general negligent driving provision under BNS 106(1) is bailable. But the specific hit-and-run provision — causing death by rash driving and then fleeing without reporting — under BNS 106(2) is non-bailable, carrying up to 10 years.
Courts will assess this on the facts of each case — there is no fixed time limit. The key is that the report must be made promptly, before the driver has had time to avoid accountability. Calling the police from the scene, going to the nearest police station immediately, or informing a magistrate promptly would qualify.
Yes. BNS 106(1) covers 'any rash or negligent act' causing death — including medical negligence. However, the Supreme Court in Jacob Mathew (2005) set a high bar: criminal prosecution requires 'gross negligence' or 'recklessness', not mere professional error or a difference of medical opinion.