BACK TO SECTIONS(2000) 4 SCC 168
Bailable (simple) / Non-Bailable (aggravated)Cognizable: YesMagistrate / Court of Session
Reform Highlights
1
Renumbered from IPC 415/416/417/420 to BNS 318 — the end of 'IPC 420' as a provision number.
2
Definition and punishment structure preserved.
3
Digital fraud explicitly covered through 'electronic means' language.
THE STATUTE
The Clause
Whoever, by deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any property to any person... commits cheating.
Legal Commentary
Section 318 is the BNS equivalent of what was popularly known as 'IPC 420' — one of the most commonly invoked criminal provisions in India and the origin of the word '420' as a colloquial term for fraud and cheating. The section defines cheating as deceiving a person and thereby fraudulently or dishonestly inducing them to deliver property, consent to retention of property, or undertake an act or omission causing damage or harm. Section 318 has a two-tier structure: simple cheating (no significant harm — up to 3 years, bailable) and aggravated cheating (dishonestly inducing delivery of property or causing significant harm — up to 7 years, non-bailable). The higher tier is what was IPC 420. The elements of cheating are: deception (any act intended to create a false impression), fraudulent or dishonest inducement (the victim acts on the false impression), and delivery of property or harmful act/omission resulting. The element of 'deception' is central — courts look at whether the accused created a false impression in the victim's mind. Misrepresentation of material facts, false promises, and concealment of material information can all constitute deception. In the digital era, cheating provisions are used extensively for online fraud, phishing, investment scams, and UPI fraud.
Landmark Precedents
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar (2000)
RELEVANCE
Dishonest intent at the inception of the transaction must be proved — non-performance of a promise later does not establish the property fraud offence under BNS 318.
Case Simulations
"A person who sells a non-existent property by showing fake documents and collects advance payment — aggravated cheating under BNS 318, up to 7 years."
"A fake job recruiter who charges processing fees for non-existent jobs — BNS 318."
"A UPI scam where the caller pretends to be a bank official and convinces the victim to share their OTP — BNS 318."
"An online seller who takes payment for goods and never delivers — BNS 318."
Expert Insights
Correct. The section number '420' no longer exists in Indian law — cheating is now BNS 318. However, '420' as a cultural expression will likely persist in common parlance long after the legal renumbering.
Yes. Creating fake investment platforms, promising unrealistic returns, and inducing people to transfer money constitutes cheating by deception under BNS 318. The 'electronic means' language ensures that digital fraud is fully covered.