CrPC Section 397 vs BNSS Section 442
BNSS Section 442 preserves the revision jurisdiction of High Courts and Sessions Courts completely — same supervisory power, same interlocutory order bar, same scope. The practical enhancement is digital case record access enabling faster revision hearings.
What Changed?
BNSS Section 442: revision jurisdiction preserved — same supervisory power.
BNSS: digital case records accessible — faster record examination.
Interlocutory order bar (Section 397(2)) preserved — BNSS 442.
BNSS: revision application can be filed electronically.
Verdict
"Digital case records enable revisional courts to examine lower court proceedings faster — reducing the administrative delay in obtaining physical records that previously slowed revision proceedings."
Detailed Analysis
CrPC Section 397
Section Data Pending
BNSS Section 442
Section Data Pending
Legal Implications
Practical Scenarios
"Bail refusal revision filed electronically under BNSS Section 442 — same as Section 397 petition; digital records available to court."
Expert Q&A
Does BNSS change revision jurisdiction?
No — BNSS Section 442 preserves CrPC Section 397's revision jurisdiction completely. Same powers, same limitations (bar on interlocutory orders), same scope. Digital records make it operationally faster.
Deepen Your Legal Knowledge
Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.
Explore All Comparisons