CrPC Section 438 vs BNSS Section 484
BNSS Section 484 preserves anticipatory bail's fundamental structure while incorporating the Sushila Aggarwal (2020) constitution bench ruling (open-ended grant) and adding digital-age conditions like GPS monitoring — modernising the most important pre-arrest protection.
What Changed?
BNSS Section 484: open-ended anticipatory bail — Sushila Aggarwal principle now in statute.
BNSS Section 484(2): electronic monitoring conditions explicitly available — GPS, digital check-in.
Same courts (HC + Sessions Court), same factors — preserved.
BNSS: AB application can be filed electronically.
CrPC had ambiguity on duration — BNSS resolves in favour of open-ended grants.
Verdict
"Open-ended anticipatory bail codification provides certainty for those under long-running investigations. Digital conditions (GPS, e-passport) enable more nuanced bail conditions that protect investigation interests without denying liberty."
Detailed Analysis
CrPC Section 438
Section Data Pending
BNSS Section 484
Section Data Pending
Legal Implications
Practical Scenarios
"Long-running investigation — BNSS Section 484 open-ended AB granted; GPS monitoring as condition; no automatic expiry when chargesheet filed."
Expert Q&A
How does BNSS Section 484 differ from CrPC Section 438?
Two key differences: (1) Sushila Aggarwal's open-ended anticipatory bail principle is now in statute — no automatic expiry; (2) electronic monitoring conditions (GPS, digital check-in) explicitly available. Substantive law otherwise identical.
Deepen Your Legal Knowledge
Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.
Explore All Comparisons