CrPC Section 482 vs BNSS Section 528
BNSS Section 528 is the exact equivalent of CrPC Section 482 — preserving the High Court's inherent jurisdiction in identical terms. Every precedent, principle, and jurisprudential development under Section 482 applies under Section 528. The only change is the section number.
What Changed?
Section number: CrPC 482 → BNSS 528.
Reference: 'this Code' → 'this Sanhita'.
Substantive powers: identical.
All Bhajan Lal seven categories apply under BNSS 528.
Settlement-based quashing (B.S. Joshi, Gian Singh) continues.
Investigation stay limits (Neeharika) continue.
Verdict
"The preservation of inherent jurisdiction without change is one of the most reassuring features of the BNSS for practitioners — the entire Section 482 practice (FIR quashing, abuse of process prevention, settlement-based quashing) continues seamlessly."
Detailed Analysis
CrPC Section 482
Section Data Pending
BNSS Section 528
Section Data Pending
Legal Implications
Practical Scenarios
"FIR quashing petition under BNSS Section 528 — identical to Section 482 petition; cite Bhajan Lal categories."
"Matrimonial settlement — quash FIR under BNSS Section 528 (same as Section 482)."
Expert Q&A
Is BNSS Section 528 the same as CrPC Section 482?
Yes — substantively identical. Same inherent powers, same purposes (give effect to code, prevent abuse, secure justice). All Section 482 case law applies. Only the section number changes.
Deepen Your Legal Knowledge
Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.
Explore All Comparisons