BACK TO SECTIONS
Side-by-Side Comparison

306 vs 108

IPC Section 306 (Abetment of Suicide) maps directly to BNS Section 108 with the same punishment of up to 10 years RI + fine. Section 309 (attempt to suicide) is effectively decriminalised — BNS has no equivalent.

What Changed?

IPC 306 and BNS 108 are substantively identical — same elements (instigation, conspiracy, intentional aid leading to suicide) and same 10-year maximum.

The critical change: IPC 309 (attempt to commit suicide, up to 1 year) has NO equivalent in the BNS — completing the decriminalisation begun by the Mental Healthcare Act 2017.

Under Mental Healthcare Act 2017 (Section 115), a person who attempts suicide is presumed to be under severe stress and must receive care and treatment — not prosecution.

Abetment of suicide by instigation requires a positive act that stirs or provokes the deceased toward suicide — mere harassment creating despair is insufficient (Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State, 2009).

A suicide note naming a person does NOT automatically establish abetment — independent evidence of the accused's instigating conduct is required (S.S. Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan, 2010).

Verdict

"BNS 108 preserves Section 306 intact. The major change is what BNS does NOT include — Section 309 (attempt to commit suicide) has no BNS equivalent, completing the decriminalisation begun by the Mental Healthcare Act 2017."

Detailed Analysis

OLD LAW (IPC)

306

Act of 1860

Abetment of suicide

If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
PunishmentUp to 10 years RI + Fine
REFORM
NEW LAW (BNS)

108

Act of 2024

Abetment of Suicide

If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
PunishmentUp to 10 years RI + Fine
1860
306 Origin
2024
108 Reform

Legal Implications

Section 306 IPC / BNS 108 holds criminally responsible those whose conduct causally and intentionally contributed to another person's death by suicide. The provision is routinely charged in: in-law/dowry harassment cases where a wife takes her life, workplace ragging/bullying cases, and increasingly in online harassment cases. Courts require a 'direct or close nexus' between the accused's conduct and the deceased's decision to end their life — casual or indirect connections are insufficient. The decriminalisation of IPC 309 (attempt to suicide) under the BNS marks a fundamental shift: the person who survives a suicide attempt is now treated as a patient deserving care, not a criminal deserving prosecution.

Practical Scenarios

"In-laws who subject a bride to daily physical and mental abuse over dowry, driving her to suicide — Section 306/BNS 108 + Section 498A/BNS 85."

"A college senior who conducts sustained ragging of a junior who subsequently takes their life — Section 306/BNS 108."

"An employer who systematically humiliates an employee in front of colleagues, following which the employee ends their life — Section 306/BNS 108."

"A person who attempts suicide (survives) — NOT prosecuted under BNS (Section 309 has no BNS equivalent)."

Expert Q&A

What is the BNS equivalent of IPC 306?

IPC Section 306 (Abetment of Suicide) is now BNS Section 108. The punishment is identical — up to 10 years rigorous imprisonment plus fine, Non-Bailable and Cognizable.

Is IPC 309 (attempt to suicide) still a crime?

Effectively no. The Mental Healthcare Act 2017 presumes every person who attempts suicide was under severe stress and mandates care rather than prosecution. The BNS contains no equivalent to Section 309, completing the decriminalisation. Prosecutions under Section 309 have been virtually extinct since 2017.

Does a suicide note naming someone automatically mean they abetted the suicide?

No — the Supreme Court in S.S. Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan (2010) held that a suicide note alone is insufficient evidence of abetment. Independent evidence of the accused's instigating conduct must be proved. Being named in a note triggers investigation, not automatic conviction.

What is the difference between abetment of suicide (306) and dowry death (304B)?

Section 304B (Dowry Death) requires: death within 7 years of marriage under abnormal circumstances after dowry-related harassment — and carries a minimum 7-year sentence with a reverse burden of proof. Section 306 (Abetment of Suicide) has no time limit, no minimum sentence, and the prosecution must affirmatively prove instigation. In practice, both are charged together in dowry-related suicide cases.

Is workplace bullying that leads to suicide covered under Section 306/BNS 108?

Yes — if the bullying constituted deliberate instigation that directly provoked the decision to commit suicide. Courts assess the directness and proximity of the connection. Sustained systematic harassment that leaves a person with no option but to end their life can constitute abetment.

Deepen Your Legal Knowledge

Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.

Explore All Comparisons