BACK TO SECTIONS
Side-by-Side Comparison

505 vs 353

The legal framework against fake news, communal rumours, and public alarm transitions to BNS 353.

What Changed?

Renumbered from IPC 505 to BNS 353.

Maintains the strict cognizable and non-bailable nature.

BNS 353 is specifically designed to handle the amplified impact of rumours in the digital age.

Verdict

"High impact on regulating social media misinformation and communal harmony."

Detailed Analysis

OLD LAW (IPC)

505

Act of 1860

Statements conducing to public mischief

Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement, rumour or report — (a) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, sailor or airman in the Army, Navy or Air Force of India to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duty as such; or (b) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public, or to any section of the public whereby any person may be induced to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquillity; or (c) with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community...
Punishment3 to 5 years or Fine or both
REFORM
NEW LAW (BNS)

353

Act of 2024

Statements conducing to public mischief

Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement, rumour or report— (a) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, sailor or airman in the Army, Navy or Air Force of India to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duty... (b) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public, or to any section of the public whereby any person may be induced to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquility; or (c) with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community... shall be punished...
PunishmentUp to 3 years or Fine or Both
1860
505 Origin
2024
353 Reform

Legal Implications

Section 353 of BNS (IPC 505) is the primary provision used to curb the spread of inflammatory rumours. Whether it is a fake report about a riot or a viral message causing public panic, this section provides severe penalties.

Practical Scenarios

"Circulating a fake viral video to incite communal tension (BNS 353)."

"Sharing a report on social media about a non-existent threat to cause panic (BNS 353)."

Expert Q&A

Is Intent mandatory for a BNS 353 charge?

Yes. The law requires the person to have the intent to cause alarm or incite disorder, or knowledge that their statement is likely to do so.

What is the BNS change to Section 505 (Statements Conducing to Public Mischief)?

IPC 505 → BNS 353. BNS explicitly adds 'electronic communication' — directly targeting viral fake news on WhatsApp, social media, and digital platforms. Punishment is preserved: 3 years for public alarm; 5 years if committed in a place of worship or religious assembly.

Can forwarding a WhatsApp message attract Section 505/BNS 353?

Yes — 'circulates' any statement is expressly included. If you forward a message creating public alarm or inciting communities AND you knew or should have known it was likely false, Section 505/BNS 353 can apply.

What is the difference between Section 505 and Section 153A?

Section 153A targets promotion of enmity between specific communities. Section 505 targets broader public mischief — fear, alarm, incitement to offences against the state, or mutiny in armed forces. The same statement could attract both sections.

Related IPC Sections

153A : Promoting Enmity...

Related BNS Sections

196 : Promoting Enmity...351 : Criminal Intimidation...

Deepen Your Legal Knowledge

Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.

Explore All Comparisons