Examination of Witnesses by Police; Confessions and Statements Before Magistrate
Police examination of witnesses during investigation; confessions and statements before Magistrate
Legal Commentary
Explanation
Sections 161–164 are the evidentiary heart of the investigation chapter — governing how witnesses are examined and confessions are recorded. Section 161 gives police the power to orally examine witnesses during investigation, but with a crucial limitation: the examined person cannot be required to answer questions that would incriminate them (privilege against self-incrimination, Article 20(3)). Section 162 is the critical inadmissibility bar: statements made to police during investigation (Section 161 statements) cannot be used as evidence in trial. This is a fundamental protection against coerced police statements — if police statements were admissible, police pressure could manufacture evidence. Section 162 statements can only be used to contradict a witness who deposes differently at trial. The inability to sign Section 161 statements prevents police from fabricating signed statements. Section 164 provides the alternative: a voluntary confession recorded by a Magistrate (not police) is admissible. The Magistrate must: warn the accused they are not bound to confess; explain that the confession may be used against them; give time to reflect (typically keeping the accused overnight before recording); and certify that the confession was voluntary. BNSS Section 183 mandates audio-video recording of Section 164-equivalent confessions — a landmark safeguard against claims of induced or coerced confessions.