Language of Courts; Evidence of Formal Character; Previous Conviction; Evidence in Absence of Accused
Procedural rules for evidence in criminal trials — language, formal proof, previous convictions, absconder's case
Legal Commentary
Explanation
Sections 272–299 address the procedural framework for evidence in criminal proceedings. Section 272 establishes that courts conduct proceedings in their own language — with translation for witnesses who speak other languages. Section 278 ensures witnesses hear their evidence read back and signed — creating an authenticated record. Section 293 is the most practically significant: government scientific expert reports (forensic reports, chemical examiner's reports, ballistic reports) can be produced as documentary evidence without the expert appearing in court, unless the court or a party specifically requires their presence. This dramatically speeds up cases involving forensic evidence. Section 299 allows recording of prosecution evidence when the accused absconds — creating a partial record of evidence before witnesses forget or become unavailable. The BNSS significantly expands the digital evidence framework and introduces new mandatory forensic investigation requirements.