CRPCSection 313Verified

Power to Examine the Accused — Right to Explain Incriminating Evidence

Court must give accused opportunity to explain each piece of incriminating evidence — without oath; silence not evidence

Legal Commentary

Section 313(1)(b): The Court shall after prosecution witnesses are examined question the accused generally on the case. Section 313(2): No oath shall be administered to the accused. Section 313(3): The accused shall not render himself liable to punishment by refusing to answer or by giving false answers.

Explanation

Section 313 is one of the most important fair trial provisions — the accused must have a personal opportunity to respond to each piece of incriminating evidence. After prosecution evidence closes, court must put each incriminating circumstance to the accused and ask them to explain. This is mandatory — not optional. No oath (not a witness); cannot be punished for silence or false answers; but answers given can be used as evidence. If accused admits a fact — that admission is evidence. Silence is not evidence of guilt (though courts may note unexplained incriminating circumstances). BNSS Section 351 adds: accused's advocate can address court after examination to explain/supplement — acknowledging that accused persons often cannot articulate legal responses without assistance.

Related Topics

CrPC Section 313examination of accused IndiaSection 313 CrPC statementaccused right to explain India313 statement CrPCBNSS Section 351accused examination mandatory IndiaSection 313 no oath Indiaright to silence India criminal trial

Quick Actions

COMPARE WITH BNS

Historical Context

Original Act
Code of Criminal Procedure
Category
CrPC
← All Code of Criminal Procedure Sections