BACK TO SECTIONS
IPC 1860REPEALED

Section 148

Rioting, armed with deadly weapon

Replaced by: BNS 191

Non-BailableCognizable: YesMagistrate First Class
THE STATUTE

Original Text

Whoever is guilty of rioting, being armed with a deadly weapon or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Simplified

Section 148 is the aggravated form of rioting — when the rioting assembly includes members carrying deadly weapons. The punishment escalates to 3 years and the offence becomes non-bailable, reflecting that armed rioters pose a qualitatively greater danger to public order and life. Every member of the riotous assembly is liable under Section 148 if any member is armed — mirroring the collective liability principle of Sections 143 and 146. In practice, Section 148 is routinely charged in communal riots and politically motivated mob violence wherever weapons (swords, machetes, firearms, petrol bombs) are recovered from the scene or participants.

Legal Evolution

Section 148 traces to the English common law offence of riot, which treated armed participation as an aggravated form of public disorder warranting greater punishment. The colonial drafters recognized that armed rioters posed a qualitatively different threat than unarmed assemblies, justifying the enhanced three-year maximum. Courts have held that the weapon need not be used — mere possession during rioting suffices.

Landmark Precedents

Lalji v. State of UP (1989)

AIR 1989 SC 754
RELEVANCE

Section 148 requires proof the accused was personally armed with a deadly weapon during the riot — group membership alone is insufficient for armed rioting liability.

Practical Scenarios

"Participating in a riot while carrying a sword or machete — Section 148."
"Rioters who have firearms or petrol bombs — armed rioting under Section 148."

Common Queries

Anything likely to cause death when used as a weapon — knives, swords, firearms, crude bombs, heavy lathis. The court applies a contextual assessment: would this object, used as a weapon in this situation, be likely to cause death?