BACK TO SECTIONS
Side-by-Side Comparison

405 vs 316

Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT) renumbered from IPC 406 to BNS 316, with identical legal elements.

What Changed?

Direct renumbering with identical legal elements.

Grouping of definition and punishment within Section 316.

Verdict

"Legal terminology for consultants, agents, and trustees shifts to Section 316."

Detailed Analysis

OLD LAW (IPC)

405

Act of 1860

Criminal breach of trust

Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged... commits 'criminal breach of trust'.
PunishmentSee Section 406
REFORM
NEW LAW (BNS)

316

Act of 2024

Forgery

Whoever makes any false document or false electronic record or part of a document or electronic record, with intent to cause damage or injury, to the public or to any person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to enter into any express or implied contract, or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed, commits forgery.
PunishmentUp to 2 years or Fine, or both
1860
405 Origin
2024
316 Reform

Legal Implications

Section 316 of the BNS is the direct descendant of IPC 406. It continues to penalise the dishonest misappropriation of property that was entrusted to someone. From business partners to domestic staff, any violation of a property-related trust remains a serious offence punishable by up to 3 years.

Practical Scenarios

"A valet taking an entrusted car for an unauthorised joyride and damaging it (BNS 316)."

"A family member refusing to return Stridhan (woman's property) entrusted to them (BNS 316)."

Expert Q&A

Has the punishment for CBT changed?

The base punishment remains 3 years or fine, similar to IPC 406.

What are the aggravated forms of CBT with higher punishments?

Section 407 — CBT by carrier or wharfinger (7 years). Section 408 — CBT by clerk or servant (7 years). Section 409/BNS 317 — CBT by public servant, banker, merchant, or attorney (life imprisonment or 10 years).

Is failure to remit employee PF contributions a criminal breach of trust?

Yes — Babu Bhai Udesia v. State of Gujarat (2009) held that when an employer deducts PF contributions from salaries but fails to remit them, the deduction creates entrustment and retention constitutes CBT under Section 406/BNS 316.

How is CBT different from cheating (Section 420)?

CBT requires prior entrustment — the property was given to the accused for a specific purpose. Cheating requires deception at inception — the accused fraudulently induced delivery. CBT is about misusing what was legally given; cheating is about taking through deception.

Deepen Your Legal Knowledge

Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.

Explore All Comparisons